The Muslim Brotherhood’s surprising legal status in Israel
Plus, Musk’s role in rising online antisemitism
Good Thursday morning!
In today’s Daily Kickoff, we examine the growing Saudi-Turkish competition for influence over Damascus and talk to House Foreign Affairs Committee Chair Rep. Brian Mast (R-FL) about his current position on Syria sanctions. We highlight the blessing given by Rabbi Yosef Hamra, the brother of the last chief rabbi of Syria, to Syrian President Ahmad al-Sharaa during his visit to Washington and delve into the legal status of the Muslim Brotherhood in Israel and why it’s not fully banned. We also report on an interview with the founders of the Track AIPAC account, who until now had been anonymous, and on Jordan Wood’s comment, after he announced his Senate bid in Maine, that he would reject contributions from AIPAC. Also in today’s Daily Kickoff: Michael Rapaport, Alex Moore and Charlie Spies.
Today’s Daily Kickoff was curated by Jewish Insider Israel Editor Tamara Zieve and U.S. Editor Danielle Cohen-Kanik, with an assist from Marc Rod. Have a tip? Email us here.
What We’re Watching
- The U.S. Commission on International Religious Freedom is holding a hearing this morning on religious freedom in Syria during the country’s transition out of dictatorship.
What You Should Know
A QUICK WORD WITH JI’S Josh Kraushaar
So much of the conversation about the rise of right-wing antisemitism has been focused on the supply side of the equation — the growing number of online commentators and podcasters, led by Tucker Carlson and Candace Owens, who are mainlining anti-Jewish tropes, conspiracy theories and Holocaust revisionism to their sizable audiences.
Less scrutinized is the demand-side part of the equation: Why are so many people in the independent podcasting ecosystem mimicking the same antisemitic arguments and hosting the same extremist guests? Is there really a significant audience for this nonsense?
On paper, there’s no constituency for this type of extremism. As an example: Carlson’s public sympathizing towards Russian dictator Vladimir Putin, for instance, is about as politically toxic as you can get with the American public. A recent NBC News poll found just 3% of Americans view Putin favorably, while a whopping 84% view him negatively.
But in the world of social media, a small but passionate audience of superfans — even if they’re extremists — can be more lucrative than a much broader audience of mainstream news consumers. The problem is that the perception of influence, fueled by these social media platforms, can become a self-fulfilling prophecy.
We saw this pattern play out on the left in the run-up to the 2020 presidential election, when politically toxic views about policing, immigration, race and gender identity received outsized attention on Twitter, were enforced by a small number of online influencers and quickly became conventional wisdom in institutional liberal circles. The shift was so profound that most of the 2020 Democratic presidential candidates embraced left-wing positions that they later ended up regretting.
With Elon Musk’s purchase of Twitter (now X), the platform’s algorithm now incentivizes far-right discourse, creating a marketplace for bigoted and antisemitic influencers. It’s what’s creating a demand for the conspiratorial content of Carlson, Owens and others, and it also explains why more-mainstream figures in the “independent” media space, like Megyn Kelly, are increasingly flirting with these extremist narratives.
“It’s not lost on me that there was a great celebration on the right when Elon Musk bought Twitter — and now it looks like one of the worst things for the right in a long time. The algorithms on X really promote the worst excesses of the post-liberal right,” said one former official at a conservative policy institution granted anonymity to discuss concerns. “Tucker and Megyn are in the business of monetizing the algorithm more than building an audience.”
REGIONAL POWER PLAY
Trump, al-Sharaa meeting highlights growing Saudi-Turkish competition for influence over Damascus

At the White House on Monday, as President Donald Trump met with Syrian President Ahmad al-Sharaa, two other high-level figures were in attendance — Saudi Defense Minister Prince Khalid bin Salman and Turkish Foreign Minister Hakan Fidan, underscoring how Syria has become a new battleground for regional influence. Following the fall of longtime dictator Bashar al-Assad’s regime last December, the war-ravaged nation has become a political vacuum, transformed into a critical security frontier for many regional players — most notably Turkey and Saudi Arabia, Jewish Insider’s Matthew Shea reports.
Stakes in Syria: “Saudi Arabia and Turkey are among the most powerful Middle Eastern countries. The power vacuum caused by the Syrian civil war turned Syria into a stage for these competing powers,” said David May, a research analyst at the Foundation for Defense of Democracies. “Both countries supported elements working to topple former Syrian strongman Bashar al-Assad.”






































































